|  |  | 

India Top Headlines

UKP & I club concerned about 25 Indian ship’s crew after “Ever Green” arrest by Suez Canal Authority | India News


HYDERABAD: Of the nearly $ 1 billion demanded by the Suez Canal Authority (SCA) as compensation for the ‘Ever given’ mishap, $ 300 million have been claimed for ‘loss of reputation’.
The ship ‘Ever Given’ that ran aground in the Suez Canal and refloated after six days has been arrested by the authorities.
There are 25 Indian crew on board the giant ship that is now on the Great Bitter Lake in the Suez Canal area.
The ship ran aground on March 23 and was refloated on March 29.
Since then, the ship has been under investigation. The boat was insured by the UK Club for protection and compensation (third parties).
“We are disappointed by comments from the Suez Canal Authority that the ship will remain in Egypt until compensation is paid, and that its crew will not be able to leave the ship during this time,” the UK P&I club said in a statement on April 13 confirming the arrest of ‘Ever Given’.
The P&I club reported that on April 7 the owners of the container ship “Ever Given” received a claim from the Suez Canal Authority (SCA) for the sum of US $ 916 million.
Despite the magnitude of the claim, which was largely unsupported, the owners and their insurers have been negotiating in good faith with the SCA.
“On April 12, a generous and carefully considered offer was made to the SCA to resolve their claim. We are disappointed by the subsequent decision of the SCA to stop the vessel today, ”the P&I club said in a statement on April 13.
It said the SCA had failed to provide a detailed justification for this extraordinarily large claim, which includes claims of $ 300 million for a “salvage bond” and a claim of $ 300 million for “loss of reputation.”
Grounding did not cause contamination and no injuries were reported.
The ship floated again after six days and the Suez Canal quickly resumed business operations. The claim filed by the SCA also does not include the claim of the professional rescuer for its salvage services that owners and their hull insurers expect to receive separately.
The P&I aspects of the claim are relatively modest, with the exception of the loss of reputation claim, which is disputed, the P&I club said in a statement.
He said the owners had fully cooperated with the SCA throughout its investigation into the cause of the ground connection. “We understand that the investigation is now complete. When the grounding occurred, the vessel was in full operation with no defects in its machinery and / or equipment and was fully manned by a competent and professional captain and crew.
The navigation was carried out under the supervision of two SCA pilots, in accordance with the Suez Canal Navigation Rules ”, he said.
The vessel’s classification society, the American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), completed its inspections on April 4 and issued a certificate of fitness to allow the vessel to move from Great Bitter Lake to Port Said, where it will then undergo a new inspection before completion. trip to Rotterdam. The owners will continue to negotiate with the SCA, the P&I club said.
The UK Club said it was working with all parties involved. “Our priority is the fair and prompt resolution of this claim to ensure the release of the ship and cargo and, more importantly, its crew of 25 remaining on board,” he said.
“Ever Given” grounded in the Suez Canal on March 23 and following the efforts of the ship’s crew, international salvage experts and local resources coordinated by the SCA, it was refloated on March 29 and transferred to anchor at the Great Bitter Lake, where remains.
“Vessel owners and managers have provided full cooperation to the SCA during its investigations. The Voyage Data Recorder (VDR) data and all other requested information have been provided to the investigators, ”he said.
The UK Club has insured the owner of “Ever Given” for certain third-party liabilities that may arise from an incident such as this, including, for example, damage to infrastructure or claims for obstruction.
The ship itself and its cargo will have been insured separately.
“While the UK Club cannot comment on any confidential insurance or details of potential claims, all valid claims will be considered by the vessel owner, the UK Club and their legal advisers in due course,” the statement said.

Original source