‘Serious interference’: India summons UK envoy, criticizes House debate on agricultural uproar | India News
Foreign Secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla told the UK High Commissioner for India that such a discussion represented “great interference” in the politics of another democratic country.
“He advised that British MPs should refrain from practicing vote bank policy by misrepresenting events, especially in relation to another fellow democracy,” the government said in a statement.
Earlier, India’s high commission in London issued a strong statement on the debate in Westminster Hall in which 17 out of 18 British MPs attacked the Indian government’s handling of the farmers’ issue and freedom of the press.
The Indian mission noted that foreign media, including the British, had been present and witnessed first-hand the events surrounding the farmers’ protests in India and therefore no “question of lack of freedom arises. of the media in India “.
“We deeply regret that, instead of a balanced debate, false claims, without foundation or fact, have been made criticizing the world’s largest functioning democracy and its institutions,” said a statement issued by the high commission after the debate. which stemmed from an electronic petition that attracted more than 100,000 signatures on the parliament’s website.
“All the issues raised are left to well-established independent democratic institutions in India to address them. It is also a matter of concern that, once again, comments were made to mislead the British Indian community, raising questions about the treatment of minorities in India, alleged human rights violations in ‘Kashmir’, etc. “, He said.
During the debate, MPs from both the Labor Party and the ruling conservatives condemned India for its treatment of peasant protesters and the alleged crackdown on the press, as well as the shutdown of the Internet and the arrest of activists.
The mission said it would normally refrain from commenting on an internal discussion involving a small group of honorable MPs in a limited quorum.
“However, when someone slanders India, regardless of their claims of friendship and love for India or internal political compulsions, things need to be clarified,” the statement said.
(With inputs from agencies)