|  |  | 

India Top Headlines

Additional attempt on UPSC-2020 exam to cascade effect, government tells SC | India News

NEW DELHI: The Center told the Supreme Court on Monday that allowing an additional attempt at the UPSC civil service exam to those who were unable to appear on their last chance in 2020 due to the Covid-19 situation would create an “effect cascading “, detrimental to the overall operation and the level playing field necessary for a public review system.
In an affidavit filed in the superior court, the Center has said that giving an extra try or loosening the age of some candidates would amount to extending differential treatment to similarly placed applicants on the exam.
The affidavit was filed days after the Center told the superior court that it was not in favor of granting civil service applicants who failed to appear on their last attempt in 2020 one more chance.
“Therefore, any relief to the petitioner, in addition to being without merit, would also result in serious harm to other candidates in the future.
“Therefore, it is respectfully presented that accommodating the present petitioners would create a cascading effect detrimental to the general functioning and the level playing field necessary in any public review system,” said the affidavit, filed by an undersecretary of the Department. of personal. and training.
The higher court that is hearing a statement requesting that applicants who were unable to appear on their last attempt in 2020 due to the pandemic be given one more chance to appear in the UPSC civil services exam.
The matter was brought before a court on Monday headed by Judge AM Khanwilkar, who released it for his hearing on January 28.
“The Additional Attorney General informs us that the answering affidavit has already been submitted. Register to know that position and circulate a copy of the answer. The petitioners can present a rejoinder to it before January 27, 2021 via email. The parties are free to submit a written note of the submissions before January 27, 2021. Please list these matters on January 28, ”said the court, which also includes Judges BR Gavai and Krishna Murari, in its order.
In its affidavit filed in the high court, the Center has said: “It should be noted that providing an additional attempt could have an even more cascading effect by creating a ground for challenge by candidates who have already applied for the CS (Preliminary) Exam-2020 ”.
“From the outset, it is curious to note that the petitioners, who participated in the examination with their eyes open, only approached this court after the results of the examination were declared. Be that as it may, it is presented that UPSC made all the necessary arrangements for the completion of the CS Exam (Preliminary) 2020 on October 4, 2020, safely and efficiently adhering to all the COVID-19 security protocols issued by the Government of India from time to time, ”he said.
He said the UPSC had given applicants the option to change their testing center to serve candidates who would have moved to a different location due to the pandemic.
He said that a total of 4,86,952 candidates took the exam on October 4 last year and that the UPSC “left no stone unturned in its quest to adapt to the means and interests of the candidates.”
“It is further alleged that the petitioners’ argument that their preparation was hampered by the stress caused by the prevailing COVID-19 pandemic is weightless, as the UPSC had already given the candidates additional time by postponing the CS (preliminary) exam-2020 from May 31, 2020 to October 4, 2020, ”he said, adding that these conditions would have affected all candidates in the exam similarly.
“It is further asserted that giving an additional try or relaxing the age of some candidates would amount to extending differential treatment to candidates similarly placed on the exam,” he said.
The affidavit said that other candidates who did not submit to the final attempt, who took the exam “without a murmur of discontent,” would be placed at a disadvantage in future exams if the petitioners requested relief is granted, as it would allow a large number of experienced candidates participate again, making the future exam excessively competitive.
“It is claimed that, therefore, those other candidates for non-final attempts would have a legitimate complaint against such participation, as their chances of being selected in a future examination would be seriously compromised,” he said.
“It is alleged that, as indicated above, in addition to having a cascading effect, it will lead to unevenness of the playing field for potential candidates, also after the petitioner has voluntarily participated in the process,” he said.
The Center said that in October of last year the fifth phase of Unblocking was in effect, which resulted in the removal of most of the restrictions regarding the movement of the public.
On September 30 last year, the high court had refused to postpone the preliminary examination of the UPSC civil service, which took place on October 4, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and flooding in various parts. from the country.
However, it had directed the central government and the Union Public Services Commission to consider granting an additional opportunity to candidates who would otherwise have their last attempt in 2020, with a corresponding extension of the upper age limit.
The bank was then told that only the Personnel and Training Department can make a formal decision.

Reference page