I cannot repeatedly say that people have the right to protest, but without blocking the roads: SC in Shaheen Bagh | India News
The higher court said it had tried to find an immediate solution by appointing interlocutors to persuade protesters of the prevailing conditions.
A bank of Judges Sanjay Kishan Kaul and K M Joseph said that, although the court had thought of adopting an immediate solution, but had no idea how successful it was.
“We have already said in previous hearings and we cannot repeatedly say that protesters have the right to protest, but cannot block the roads,” the bank said.
The main comments of the court came after defender Shashank Deo Sudhi, who appeared for BJP leader Nand Kishore Garg, sought a provisional order to remove protesters from the road in Shaheen Bagh, saying that the people They are using their right to protest as a weapon and causing inconvenience to others. .
He added: “We have thought of something that was an immediate solution to the problem. However, we do not know to what extent we have succeeded, but we must say that the interlocutors have done everything possible to do everything necessary to find the problem.” solution. We appreciate your efforts. ”
The bank said it had reviewed the report of the two interlocutors, the main defender Sanjay Hegde and the defender Sadhana Ramachandran.
He told the interlocutors that the people of Shaheen Bagh have to come forward to the solution.
“The appointment of the interlocutors was a ready-to-use solution. But let’s see how far we have succeeded.”
Attorney General Tushar Mehta, who appeared for the Center, said the court asked the interlocutors to persuade protesters to leave the road, not to find alternatives to blocked roads.
To this, the bank said, the court order was very clear in this regard.
“Their job was to instill confidence among the protesters that they have the right to protest but not in this place. We believe they did their job well and we appreciate it,” the bank said.
He asked all parties to maintain their composure, saying that “this is not the way the developing society works and behaves. There may be a difference of opinion. People may have their opposite opinion that can be debated. It has to have a way of debate. ” ”
The higher court agreed with Mehta’s views that “the manifestation of dissent should be civilized.”
The attorney general said that the observation of the court should not be put in order, as it can have a demoralizing effect on law enforcement agencies.
“We agree with that. The problem is that the people of the media in court start tweeting about any word pronounced in court. By the time the order is issued, it spreads everywhere. Many times, what what has been expressed in court is not part of the order. What we say in court is part of the discussion, what we have. We must say that the opinions of the court are in your order, “said the bank.
Mehta said he was not referring to the media, but to the parties on the other side, which may refer to the order of the higher court in other judicial platforms.
Attorney Mehmood Pracha, who appeared for some of the parties, said it is an open court and that the media can report the observation made during the process.
The bank postponed the hearing on the matter for March 23.
The higher court heard two pleas, one from lawyer and petitioner Amit Sahni and one from BJP leader Nand Kishore Garg, seeking the expulsion of protesters from Shaheen Bagh, the epicenter of agitation against the Citizens Amendment Act for more of two months.
On Monday, interlocutors appointed by the Supreme Court presented their report on a sealed cover in the high court after their talks with protesters in Shaheen Bagh.
On February 17, the court asked lead attorney Sanjay Hegde to “play a constructive role as an interlocutor” and talk to the protesters to move to an alternative site where no public place will be blocked.
He had said that Hegde along with lawyer Sadhana Ramachandran or anyone else of his choice can talk to the protesters.
Sahni, who had approached the Delhi High Court seeking instructions to reach the Delhi Police to ensure a flow of fluid traffic on the Kalindi Kunj-Shaheen Bagh section, which was blocked by anti-CAA protesters on December 15 of the year past.
While dealing with Sahni’s request, the higher court had asked the local authorities to deal with the situation taking into account the law and order.
Separately, former BJP MLA Nand Kishore Garg has submitted a statement in the higher court seeking instructions to the authorities to eliminate the protesters of Shaheen Bagh.
Restrictions have been imposed on the Kalindi Kunj-Shaheen Bagh section and the Okhla underpass, which were closed on December 15 last year due to protests against the CAA and the National Register of Citizens (NRC).