When and if CAA is declared constitutional by SC, it will be problematic for states to oppose it: Sibal | India News
His remarks came a day after he had said
there is no way a state can deny
+ the implementation of the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) when it is already passed by Parliament.
I believe the CAA is unconstitutional Every State Assembly has the constitutional right to pass a resolution and… https://t.co/DfGNCwiyEV
— Kapil Sibal (@KapilSibal) 1579392263000
“I believe the CAA is unconstitutional. Every State Assembly has the constitutional right to pass a resolution and seek its withdrawal. When and if the law is declared to be constitutional by the Supreme Court then it will be problematic to oppose it. The fight must go on!” Sibal said in a tweet.
His remarks on the CAA at the the Kerala Literature Festival (KLF) on Saturday had caused a flutter as several non-BJP governments, including Kerala, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, West Bengal and Maharashtra, have voiced their disagreement with the CAA as well as National Register of Citizens (NRC) and National Population Register (NPR).
“If the CAA is passed no state can say ‘I will not implement it’. It is not possible and is unconstitutional. You can oppose it, you can pass a resolution in the Assembly and ask the central government to withdraw it.
“But constitutionally saying that I won’t implement, it is going to be problematic and going to create more difficulties,” said the former minister of law and justice.